However, I was recently introduced to the idea that this entitlement might not be beneficial for America or for me. What if this entitlement didn't actually encourage home ownership at all? What if it only helped those in the mid- and high-income tax brackets who would have bought the home anyway? If you're in the 35% tax bracket, you get $35 of savings for every $100 of mortgage interest you pay, but if you're in the 15% tax bracket, you only get $15. What if panels under Obama and Bush tried to eliminate or reform this tax, but were shot down due to its unpopularity. Wouldn't a reformed approach that truly encouraged home ownership improve our falling house prices? Would such an approach be choked out by lobbyists and closed-minded voters? Even critics of reform seem to be saying, "Good idea, but not right now."
Maybe this entitlement program worked in 1913, but it is worthy of review. It is our oldest and largest standing tax deduction. As voters we have to loosen our grip on entitlements long enough to explore better alternatives.







